Better ban rallies than let people get killed: Armenian politician
Read it in Russian
“It is better to ban
rallies than let people get killed,” Armenian MP (ruling Republican
Party) Rafik
Petrosyan stated at a press conference in Yerevan on March 24. In
his words, if Armenian parliament did not approve amendments to the
law on rallies, processions, and demonstrations, the turmoil in the
country would persist.
Commenting on the legislation
provision according to which all rallies will be prohibited until all
participants and facts of preceding riots are established, Rafik
Petrosyan argued that the restrictive norm would be in effect for no
longer than three months. Mr Petrosyan also noted that, even before
the amendments to the legislation draft were approved, the draft “was
signed under by representatives of the former opposition” (The
Orinats Yerkir Party – REGNUM).
Petrosyan's opponent, MP from
the Heritage opposition faction Larisa
Alaverdyan stated that the amended law contradicted to all
international norms defining human rights and freedoms. Alaverdyan
claimed that, instead of looking for the ways of establishing dialog
during the 20 days of the state of emergency in Yerevan, the
authorities used the time to develop the legislation draft.
According to Alaverdyan, the
legislation is of a contextual character and is not aimed at solving
key issues. She claims that the amendments were adopted by Armenian
parliament with violation of rules of procedure, for the deputies
read the draft no earlier than the day of the extraordinary session.
To remind, on March 18,
acting president of Armenia Robert
Kocharyan signed a bill amending the law “On Holding
Gatherings, Rallies, Processions, and Demonstrations.”
The amendments provide that a
responsible agency can reject an applicant to hold a rally if the
agency has obtained reliable information about the planned event's
being targeted at overthrowing a constitutional order, inciting
racial, ethnic, or religious hatred, propagating violence and war, or
threatening national security, public order, morality and health of
the people.
According to another
amendment, official conclusions of the police and National Security
Service can be regarded as such reliable data. Amendments also
stipulate that in cases when public actions have transformed into
civil disorders, leading to death of people, a responsible agency, in
order to halt the crimes and prevent their happening again, has a
right to temporarily ban organization of mass public events until all
facts and persons who have committed crimes are established.
According to the amendments,
a responsible agency is supposed to examine an application for an
event to be held for 72 hours, and applications for holding a public
event are to be submitted five days before the event date.